近來，美國為維護(hù)自身霸權(quán)私利、遏制中國發(fā)展，加緊在經(jīng)貿(mào)、科技等領(lǐng)域推動對華“脫鉤斷鏈”。這種損人不利己的昏招，既背離客觀現(xiàn)實(shí)，又違逆發(fā)展規(guī)律，損害了包括中美在內(nèi)的各國企業(yè)利益和民眾福祉，是一條注定走不通的死路，暴露了美國政客的自私算計(jì)和反智嘴臉。

The recent U.S. Census Bureau data suggest that the U.S. merchandise trade deficit with China was larger in 2022 than when Donald Trump was president, said an article on the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace website.
美國卡內(nèi)基國際和平基金會網(wǎng)站刊文稱，美國人口調(diào)查局最新數(shù)據(jù)表明，2022年美國對華商品貿(mào)易逆差比唐納德·特朗普總統(tǒng)時(shí)期還要大。

Adding that America's overall trade deficit hit an all-time high of 1.18 trillion U.S. dollars, Carnegie noted that this fortifies the view that "tariffs would not reduce U.S. trade deficits and the costs would be paid largely by Americans."
卡內(nèi)基國際和平基金會稱，美國的總體貿(mào)易逆差達(dá)到1.18萬億美元，創(chuàng)歷史新高，并指出這印證了“加征關(guān)稅不會減少美國貿(mào)易逆差，成本將主要由美國人支付”的觀點(diǎn)。

Similarly, the Financial Times recently commented on "waging war on trade," describing the current U.S. approach as "a negative-sum game" and stressing that politicizing trade will surely lead to wasteful outcomes.
英國《金融時(shí)報(bào)》近日就“貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)”發(fā)表評論，將美國當(dāng)前的做法描述為“負(fù)和游戲”，并強(qiáng)調(diào)貿(mào)易政治化必將得不償失。

The slowdown in world trade, the article's author Martin Wolf wrote, the shift towards economic nationalism, and the growing demands in the West for decoupling from China "are reshaping the global economy."
文章作者馬丁·沃爾夫?qū)懙溃澜缳Q(mào)易放緩、某些國家訴諸“經(jīng)濟(jì)民族主義”，以及西方內(nèi)部甚囂塵上的對華“脫鉤”言行，正在重創(chuàng)全球經(jīng)濟(jì)。

In recent years, the U.S. bullying trading tactics have caused an increase in costs for international companies, a decrease in their competitiveness, and harm the interests of consumers.
近年來，美國肆意揮舞制裁大棒，導(dǎo)致跨國企業(yè)成本提高、競爭力下降，消費(fèi)者利益受損。

Statistics show that the previous U.S. government has implemented over 3,900 sanctions, which is an average of three sanctions per day. The Biden administration has also announced a "Buy American" rule, requiring any goods purchased with taxpayer money to contain 75 percent American-made content.
據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)，美國上屆政府累計(jì)實(shí)施逾3900項(xiàng)制裁措施，相當(dāng)于平均每天3項(xiàng)。拜登政府延續(xù)了特朗普政府的貿(mào)易政策，還宣布將聯(lián)邦政府采購的“美國貨”中美國制造零部件的比重提高至75%。

Despite what appears to be a periodic implementation of protectionist and unilateral policies, American firms are reluctant to undertake such a shift, which could undermine their prospects in the global economy, said Rahim Teymoori, a researcher at the Development and Foresight Research Center of the Plan and Budget Organization of Iran.
伊朗計(jì)劃與預(yù)算組織發(fā)展和遠(yuǎn)見研究中心研究員拉希姆·泰穆里表示，美國跨國企業(yè)是全球化浪潮的巨大受益者，并不樂見美國政府的保護(hù)主義、單邊主義做法。

"Although such economic policies would, in the short term, possibly contribute to the U.S. production sector on the back of the government's financial support and protection, they, in the long run, would harm the U.S. companies' competitiveness as they would lose a big integrated market, in which their connections have been formed," he said.
“雖然這樣的經(jīng)濟(jì)政策在短期內(nèi)可能會在政府財(cái)政支持和保護(hù)下為美國的生產(chǎn)部門做出貢獻(xiàn)，但從長遠(yuǎn)來看，會損害美國企業(yè)的競爭力，導(dǎo)致美企競爭力下降，失去巨大的全球市場。”

Domestically, Washington's trade war have caused sweeping losses borne by ordinary people. Worldwide, U.S. protectionist policies can lead to disordered supply chains, severe inflation shocks, and an increase in living costs.
美國發(fā)起貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)，在國內(nèi)極大損害了普通民眾利益。在全球范圍內(nèi)，美國的保護(hù)主義政策可能導(dǎo)致供應(yīng)鏈混亂、嚴(yán)重的通脹沖擊和生活成本的增加。

The United States is not only restricting its companies' overseas economic activities, escalating export controls, and introducing the Chips and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to protect its interests, but also coercing other countries into joining the sanctions and forcing others to do things that are not good for themselves, said a Japanese researcher, noting that "this is an act of the mafia."
現(xiàn)在美國不僅限制本國企業(yè)的海外經(jīng)濟(jì)活動，不斷升級出口管制，出臺旨在維護(hù)美國利益的《2022芯片與科學(xué)法案》《通脹削減法案》和《基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投資和就業(yè)法》，還脅迫別的國家加入制裁隊(duì)伍、逼別人做于己不利的事。日本佳能全球研究所的研究主任瀨口清之說，“這是黑社會行徑”。

Kiyoyuki Seguchi, research director at Japan's Canon Institute for Global Studies, said that the U.S. export restrictions on semiconductors have affected companies in Japan, South Korea, the Netherlands and other countries, and even the United States itself.
瀨口清之說，美國在半導(dǎo)體領(lǐng)域限制出口，導(dǎo)致日本、韓國、荷蘭等國企業(yè)也受到?jīng)_擊，美國企業(yè)的日子同樣難過。

In Seguchi's opinion, the U.S. adoption of a zero-sum economics policy cannot succeed in the real economic field because "the logic in economic relations is that either win-win or lose-lose, there can be no result where one side wins and the other loses."
在瀨口看來，美國搞“零和經(jīng)濟(jì)”在現(xiàn)實(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域不可能成功，因?yàn)椤敖?jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系中的邏輯是，要么雙贏，要么雙輸，不可能存在一方贏而另一方輸?shù)慕Y(jié)果”。

Partly due to U.S. trade protectionism and the spillover effects of previous monetary and fiscal policies, global inflation has risen to a 40-year high and more than 60 percent of low-income developing countries are in debt trouble.
在美國貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義政策和此前巨量“放水”的貨幣政策、財(cái)政政策外溢效應(yīng)綜合影響下，全球通脹升至40年來高點(diǎn)，超過60%的低收入國家面臨債務(wù)困境。

來源：新華社
編輯：董靜，李蕙帆（實(shí)習(xí)）